Sack exchange

When NFL fans think of Brett Favre serving up a "self-sack," they might think of alleged racy text messages he sent while a member of the New York Jets in 2008.

But for football purists, a Favre "self-sack" conjures up memories of the 2001 regular season finale when Favre's Green Bay Packers took on the New York Giants. In that contest, Giants' defender Michael Strahan needed only one quarterback sack to get to 22.5 on the season, eclipsing the nearly two-decade old single season record of 22 set by the New York Jets' Mark Gastineau in 1984.

Strahan did indeed usurp Gastineau on this play with just under three minutes remaining in the game:

In the aftermath of that game, many (including Gastineau, who was present at Giants Stadium that day) ascertained that Favre did indeed give himself up in order for Strahan to get the record. While Gastineau graciously congratulated Strahan afterward, he later revealed that he's never stopped believing that Strahan's record is forever tainted. 

In 2023, Gastineau had an opportunity to confront Favre to let him know he's *still* not over it. 

Given that Gastineau-Favre exchange was first seen by the general public just this week, there's been a lot of reaction to that uncomfortable encounter. As such, Favre himself chose to address the matter. 

I want to clear the air on the footage released showing a small dustup between myself and Mark Gastineau, the former New York Jet.

Back in 2002, when Michael Strahan sacked me at the end of a game that we had wrapped up, I was in no way trying to hurt Mark Gastineau.

I was trying to close out a game and squeeze the last bit of fun out of a hard-fought game.

I booted out of a run thinking it would be wide open, saw Strahan standing there and ducked down.

The game was over.

There was no need for me to do anything spectacular.

It probably wasn’t Michael’s best sack or tackle for loss.

In a different game or situation, I would have made a bigger effort to avoid the sack or TFL.

But at no point was I thinking about hurting Gastineau. Maybe it crossed my mind to help Strahan. I didn’t think it through. That wasn’t my forte at the time.

I just wanted to have fun and compete. In retrospect, I understand how Gastineau feels. We played a brutal game. Gastineau played during an era where guys didn’t make generational wealth.

I see now how being the Sack King would elevate his value at card shows, strengthen his case for the Hall of Fame, increase his demand as a public speaker.

I had no way of knowing that then. I realize now the potential financial implications because football is far more business-oriented than when me or Mark played.

There was no malice on my part.

Mark was a great player.

My understanding is he’s a great guy and a fun teammate, a guy who played with the kind of joy and passion I tried to mimic. I understand his frustration, but I’m not his enemy.

A while back, he saw me at a card show and got his frustration off his chest.

It’s not the kind of moment that should be filmed and released. It was a private moment of frustration between two old football warriors.

I have a great deal of respect for Mark.

I hope one day he joins me in the Hall of Fame.

He earned it. Look at his numbers.

He eclipsed 20 sacks twice and had 19 in another year!

Mark definitely left an indelible mark on the game.

I hope this controversy brings attention to just how great Mark Gastineau was.

He belongs in Canton.

I remember watching that Packers-Giants tilt given the magnitude of the record at stake. Favre and Strahan were the ultimate competitors, so I figured Strahan was going to have to work doubly hard to get just one sack that day. And sure enough, Favre successfully dodged Strahan's many attempts to get a sack, including getting hit many times just as he released the ball. So I was quite taken aback when it appeared Favre "took a dive" late in the game. Also, the play call made no sense since the Packers were up two scores (34-25) with under three minutes remaining and the Giants having all three timeouts plus the two-minute warning. Why would Favre risk throwing an incompletion to stop the clock and spare the opponent from burning their timeouts? Quite simply, he appeared to have other motives. 

With the ESPN 30 for 30 special New York Sack Exchange debuting this Friday, it explores the 1980s era of Jets football and how prolific they were in getting to the quarterback. Of the clips I've seen thus far, Gastineau seems to believe that he'd be in the Pro Football Hall of Fame were he still in possession of that single season record. That seems to be a bit of a stretch since there a many HOF eligible defensive players who have more (unofficial) career sacks than Gastineau but have yet to receive their calls.

From a human standpoint, I'm hoping Gastineau can find some peace, especially since he himself is dealing with some obvious physical maladies due to his decade long NFL career. 

-------------------------------------------------------

The NARN Closer's playlist - 12/8/2024

------------------------------------------------

Never give yourself no time, got too many bills to pay......

A lot to get to on today's edition of my radio show The Closer. The 2-hour broadcast gets started at 1:00 PM Central Time. 

I'll weigh in on President Joe Biden going back on his word in accepting whatever legal judgment was levied against son Hunter by giving him a full pardon. Also, prominent leftists still have learned no lessons from this past election cycle. And finally, is Pete Hegseth's nomination for Secretary of Defense in peril? 

At 1:30, Rep. Harry Niska (R-Ramsey) will join the broadcast to discuss sobering numbers in the state of Minnesota's recently released budget forecast. 

Then at 2:00, political commentator Jon Gabriel will check in to promote his new novel Sink the Rising Sun. We'll also try to coax Jon into talking some politics. 

So please call (651) 289-4488 if you'd like to weigh in on any of the topics we plan on addressing.

 

You can listen live in the Twin Cities at AM 1280 or, if you're near downtown Minneapolis/West Metro area, 107.5 FM on your radio dial. In and out of the Minneapolis-St Paul area you can listen to the program on the Internet by clicking this link, or check us out via iheart radio as well as Amazon Alexa (just say "Alexa, play The Patriot Minneapolis"). If you're unable to tune in live, please check out my podcast page for the latest show post.

And if you're so inclined, follow along on Twitter at #NARNShow or "Like" our Facebook page, where we also conduct a "Live Stream" of the broadcast.

Until then.....

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hegseth getting Kavanaugh'd?

With Pete Hegseth being tapped as President-elect Donald Trump's choice for Secretary of Defense, it was inevitable the proverbial long knives would come out. And while we shouldn't object to heavy scrutiny of someone's background given they're being considered for such a vital position in our government, we should all be outraged over bad faith framing of said scrutiny. 

This was the headline of a New York Times piece:

 

Pete Hegseth’s mother accused her son of mistreating women for years. 

If you only went by the headline, you'd ascertain this was a recent development and that Hegseth is so toxic that his own mother is willing to throw him under the bus. 

As we delve further into this piece, this accusation was levied in an email Penny Hegseth sent to her son back in 2018.

“I have no respect for any man that belittles, lies, cheats, sleeps around and uses women for his own power and ego. You are that man (and have been for years) and as your mother, it pains me and embarrasses me to say that, but it is the sad, sad truth.”

But you have to get to the fourth and fifth paragraphs to realize that Mrs. Hegseth doesn't still carry that anger she conveyed in that 6-year old email.

(I)n a phone interview with The New York Times on Friday, (Mrs. Hegseth) said that she had sent her son an immediate follow-up email at the time apologizing for what she had written. She said she had fired off the original email “in anger, with emotion” at a time when he and his wife were going through a very difficult divorce.

In the interview, she defended her son and disavowed the sentiments she had expressed in the initial email about his character and treatment of women. “It is not true. It has never been true,” she said. She added: “I know my son. He is a good father, husband.” She said that publishing the contents of the first email was “disgusting.”

The timing of this is important. The email was written about a year after the occasion of Pete and girlfriend Jenny having a daughter together (Pete was still married to wife #2 when Jenny became pregnant). But the couple had yet to marry since Pete was either going through or had just finalized acrimonious divorce proceedings. He and Jenny finally married in 2019 and have been together ever since. So despite his obvious moral failings with his first two wives in addition to the well documented hookup in Monterey, California while Jenny was home with a 2-month old, is it possible Pete has turned over a new leaf? His mother seems to think so, which is important context for this story. But that wouldn't have made for a good clickbait-y headline I guess. 

In the end, Pete will have to answer for these indiscretions. But once he provides retorts, can there possibly be any inquiries for how he'd head up a department that has failed audits for several years running now? 

-----------------------------------------

Expendable

Once the media realized their gaslighting campaign of propping up President Joe Biden as a viable candidate for reelection failed miserably (thus he succumbed to pressure to end his 2024 campaign in July), the long knives slowly but surely started to come out. Specifically, Biden's fecklessness enticed many voters to pine for the days of President Donald Trump's administration. 

NBC's Chuck Todd, in the aftermath of Biden pardoning his son Hunter over gun charges, tax evasion, etc., laid out what many of his media cohorts know but don't have the fortitude to say.

I talk to @chucktodd every Monday for my newsletter.

It's always a good conversation.

But, I thought Chuck NAILED it today on why the Hunter Biden trial really mattered when thinking about the Biden presidency and the pardon.

Watch the whole thing at the link in my bio. pic.twitter.com/FzBUBKM1cI

— Chris Cillizza (@ChrisCillizza) December 3, 2024

The thing is, this is who Biden has always been in his nearly 50 years in Washington D.C. (36 years as a U.S. Senator, eight as V.P. and four as POTUS), yet the media insisted in his 2020 presidential campaign that his candidacy offered a viable alternative to the corruption, incompetence and crass behavior of then President Trump. But now that Biden's disastrous presidency has resulted in Dems getting crushed this past election cycle, the media et al are suddenly willing to call out Biden for the power hungry elitist he's been for decades. So while I applaud Todd for his candor here, it would have been a lot more courageous had he conveyed such insights 4-5 years ago. Ironically, more scrutiny of Biden's background/record may have led to the reelection of Trump in 2020, but the lack of media integrity subsequent to that election played a role in Trump rising to power again in '24.

-----------------------------------------------

Utterly predictable

If I were a betting man, I woulda gone with January 19th, 2025 for this to occur. 

Yes, despite multiple assurances from his administration (which we knew were lies anyways), President Joe Biden pardons his son Hunter. 

Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and I kept my word even as I have watched my son being selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted. Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions. It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.

The charges in his cases came about only after several of my political opponents in Congress instigated them to attack me and oppose my election. Then, a carefully negotiated plea deal, agreed to by the Department of Justice, unraveled in the court room – with a number of my political opponents in Congress taking credit for bringing political pressure on the process. Had the plea deal held, it would have been a fair, reasonable resolution of Hunter’s cases.

No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son – and that is wrong. There has been an effort to break Hunter – who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution. In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me – and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough.

For my entire career I have followed a simple principle: just tell the American people the truth. They’ll be fair-minded. Here’s the truth: I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice – and once I made this decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further. I hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision.

If President Biden really believes all of this, then he needs to pardon Donald Trump over his 34 felony convictions handed down six months ago. I mean, can anyone make a coherent argument that Trump wasn't "selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted" and that these charges were in no way brought about by his "political opponents?" Sure, the sentencing of Trump in the hush money convictions is postponed indefinitely while he serves his 4-year term as POTUS, but there's still a nonzero change he could be saddled with jail time come 2029. But Biden pardoning him would ensure that never happens. 

This part of the statement is the proverbial chef's kiss - "I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice." Like manipulating legal statute to turn misdemeanors into felonies, which could lead to jail time, all to prevent someone from running for President again? 

------------------------------------------------

On today's NARN.....

I am traveling for my day job, but there will be a special edition of my radio show The Closer today from 1:00 PM until 3:00 Central Time. 

Abshir Omar, who was one of a handful of Minneapolis Somalis who left the Democrats to support Donald Trump last month, will be guest hosting today. Sadly, Abshir's nephew was murdered Thanksgiving Day, further validating his decision to split with leftists over their fecklessness concerning violent crime in Minneapolis. Nevertheless, Abshir has chosen to fulfill his commitment to guest-hosting today's show. 

You can listen live in the Twin Cities at AM 1280 or, if you're near downtown Minneapolis/West Metro area, 107.5 FM on your radio dial. In and out of the Minneapolis-St Paul area you can listen to the program on the Internet by clicking this link, or check us out via iheart radio as well as Amazon Alexa (just say "Alexa, play The Patriot Minneapolis"). If you're unable to tune in live, please check out my podcast page for the latest show post.

And if you're so inclined, follow along on Twitter at #NARNShow or "Like" our Facebook page.
Until then.....

------------------------------------------------------------------------