As each day passes, the Democrats are being painted as primarily responsible for the ongoing Federal government shutdown (heck, the Dems themselves are pretty much admitting it). The only mystery remaining is if Republicans can stand firm (*never* a sure thing).
Like in 2017 when Republican policy initiatives were thwarted, President Donald Trump is calling for the ultimate "trump card" in order to move forward.
There it is — Trump calls for Senate Republicans to nuke the filibuster. pic.twitter.com/3y3lh4qBXQ
— Andrew Desiderio (@AndrewDesiderio) October 31, 2025
And as they did in Trump's first term, the Republican majority in the U.S. Senate should decline this request.
Fred Bauer at National Review spelled it out last week.
This isn’t eight-dimensional chess. For weeks now, progressive influencers have been calling on Republicans to nuke the filibuster and end the government shutdown. They want that to happen for a variety of reasons. In 2021 and 2022, Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema took the heat for blocking the nuclear option. That spared those Democratic senators with some institutionalist impulses (such as Delaware Senator Chris Coons) from having to disappoint progressive activists by opposing the nuclear option themselves. In a future Democratic Senate majority, the Manchin–Sinema heat shield would be gone. Maine independent Angus King would probably very much like not to be the deciding vote on nuking the filibuster. If Republicans nuke the filibuster now and create that precedent, they end up sparing the Democratic caucus from facing that uncomfortable discussion. A post-nuclear Senate would toss the keys to “the groups.” If there’s any uncertainty about whether every Senate Democrat is really on board with that agenda, it’s far better from progressive activists’ perspectives that Republicans nuke the Senate for them. (And, as Joe Manchin recognized years ago, there is no such thing as a limited “carve-out” via the nuclear option — any “carve-out” puts the whole bird on the table.)
Further, Republicans’ nuking of the filibuster would also be a tactical win for Senate Democrats. Right now, the government remains shut down until enough Senate Democrats come to the table to negotiate. However, the activist base of the party does not want any negotiations with Republicans; they want full-spectrum opposition. This puts Senate Democrats in a tough position: Either keep the government shut down (and thus give the White House increased leverage in determining federal spending), or frustrate the inflatable-clad legions. Seen in that light, the nuclear option on the filibuster would allow Democrats to have their cake and eat it, too. They would get to both engage in performative opposition to Republican governance and see the government reopen.
Charles C.W. Cooke piggybacked off the tweet I posted earlier.
Trump also did so in his first term. Republicans said no, and recruited 30+ Senate Democrats to sign a letter opposing it. All but two of those Democrats then reversed themselves after Biden won. By contrast, the Republicans did not reverse themselves after Trump won. https://t.co/Nf7DWrusps
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) October 31, 2025
So if the Senate GOP does indeed bend the knee to Trump, they would not only lose the moral authority the Dems squandered over the filibuster, but they would effectively be sanctioning radically progressive policies. Y'see, it's not unlikely that Democrats will have a trifecta in Washington again. And given how the left has not been shy about their desires to completely shatter constitutional norms (i.e. pack the U.S. Supreme Court, give statehood to D.C. and Puerto Rico, abolish the Electoral College, etc.), you're pretty much clearing the decks for that to occur if the filibuster is nuked.
It appears Senate Republicans not only have to stand firm against their Democrat colleagues in the upper chamber but also the top elected official in their party. Hold steady, GOP.
UPDATE: Republicans respectfully decline Trump's request.
------------------------------------------

